Soldak Home   Drox Operative   Din's Curse   Depths of Peril   Zombasite  

Go Back   Soldak Entertainment Forums > News > News/Blog comments
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2010, 02:49 PM
Shadow's Avatar
Shadow Shadow is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 8,254
Default Free vs purchased demos

There has been some talk recently about charging gamers for demos. So far I've seen Crytek and EA mentioning the idea. I personally think the idea is pretty ridiculous.

Demos are pretty much a marketing tool. Like most marketing, it's a way to find people that find our game worth more than the money we are charging. Ultimately, when it works we have found a nice win-win situation.

However charging for the demo just seems very wrong. First of all, it means you are now demanding payment for your marketing. What's next, making the customer pay for your ads? Also what happens when they don't like your demo (which is going to happen fairly often)? The company got some amount of money, but the customer paid for something they didn't enjoy. A lose-win situation.

Personally I really dislike lose-win situations in business. I'm not in competition with our customers. We are in a mutually beneficial relationship, a loss for them is a loss for me. As a small aside, this is why we have a money back guarantee on all of our games.

All of this seems kind of obvious to me, so it's strange that this concept keeps popping up.
__________________
Steven Peeler
Designer/programmer
Depths of Peril, Kivi's Underworld, Din's Curse, Drox Operative, & Zombasite
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-25-2010, 02:56 PM
dnuggs40 dnuggs40 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 72
Default

They don't sit right with me, either. I will say that the example given in the article (BF1943) that if the demos have that much content then they are basically worth $15. However, I think overall the main thing is we are basically (as the consumer) paying for marketing materials (in a sense) and paying for a company to offload some of it's liability on to us.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-25-2010, 03:22 PM
getter77 getter77 is offline
Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 173
Default

Blood from a stone is all the rage these days in high-end corporate culture. Coming soon, a fusion of this with Episodic-MicroDLC based gaming----wave of the future dude!

Then again, time will tell exactly what the fate/mindset of the big boys in the gaming industry is once the "outsider" top-suits golden parachute on out of there to greener pastures/some island.
__________________
Brian Emre Jeffears
Aspiring Designer/Programmer/Composer
in training
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-2010, 03:46 PM
SharpCarlos SharpCarlos is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 53
Default

I'm gonna sort of play devil's advocate on this. Now, I agree that if it's REALLY a demo (a way to DEMOnstrate the game to people who haven't made up their minds yet), then charging for it makes zero sense. Just like has been said, it's the same as charging somebody to watch an advertisement.

But what if it's more of a preview than a demo? Like, "Hey, this game's not going to be out for six months, but you know you want it, so, would you pay $5 for the first few levels?" For instance, would I pay $5 to play the first 3 hours of Diablo III right now? Yeah, I would.

And using getter77's comment about "Episodic-MicroDLC based gaming", if the "demo" is actually a mini-prequel, with content that won't be in the real release, even better (Isn't Dead Rising considering something like that?).

So, yeah, charging me to TRY something I'm not sure about... that's just crazy. But charging for a taste of something I'm already committed to? I have to admit, I'd buy into that.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2010, 03:50 PM
dnuggs40 dnuggs40 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 72
Default

Well like mentioned before, they used Battlefield 1943 as an example...though don't know if you have an XBox 360 and if you tried it out.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-25-2010, 03:56 PM
Shadow's Avatar
Shadow Shadow is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 8,254
Default

It really depends on how they do it. They could just be charging for a demo which sucks. They could be selling the first few levels, but you would essentially be double charged when you bought the full game. Or it could be a completely optional and separate prequel DLC type of thing which would be kind of cool.
__________________
Steven Peeler
Designer/programmer
Depths of Peril, Kivi's Underworld, Din's Curse, Drox Operative, & Zombasite
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2010, 04:25 PM
Jorlen's Avatar
Jorlen Jorlen is offline
Champion
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada's Capital
Posts: 229
Default

I don't care how you choose to slice it; charging for a demo is lame, and most people will not pay for a demo. If I see games charge for a demo, I will consider NOT buying the final product on principle alone, because this madness must be discouraged from all fronts, IMO.

Is it me or are we seeing some nasty trends in the past years by big publishers?
__________________
- Jorlen
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2010, 04:35 PM
Amberjoy's Avatar
Amberjoy Amberjoy is offline
Elite
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calif.
Posts: 302
Default

No to charging for demo's!!!!

A demo is to find out if it's interesting enough to invest in your time and hard earned money. I already hate the company's who have demo's you can only play for exactly 1 hour. I have yet to find anything interesting enough to buy when they do that. Having to pay for the demo would be adding insult to injury.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-25-2010, 04:51 PM
jakobrogert jakobrogert is offline
Amateur
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Crap I wrote a load and the forum killed my post.
Anyway - yeah, simply charging for a preview sounds very stupid and very sad.

BUT! If we, as the poster above says, start to dig in the business model, it's not too foreign to see games as a subscription service - rather than the selling of a product: I would definitely pay to keep getting expansions, updates, improvements and added content, to Din's Curse, monthly. Just like I pay monthly for a magazine subscription, or Spotify (music subscription). And I even think that making miniversions of your game and selling them for (a lot) less is an interesting idea.
In some cases, like with Din's Curse and Battlefield-man-shooters it could work (as opposed to story-based, prescripted, static games like bioshock).

I don't think developers would mind if their games could start generating interest, feedback and income as they enter a playable enough stage, even if there's still content to be done.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-25-2010, 06:36 PM
TheRani TheRani is offline
Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 137
Default

I don't mind free demos that I can only play for so many levels or for only an hour. I've bought games after playing such demos. But I will never pay for a demo.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 - 2016 Soldak Entertainment, Inc.